Trump’s effort led by Stephen Miller and the Homelnad Dept.has almost UNIVERSILY been struck down by Federal Judges from the Supreme Court to the single courtroom judges….
The juidges have been appointed from Bush II to Trump himself….
With the latest violent attack?
There WILL stronger effort’s to go around the rulings, or simply ignore them…
The Trump administration’s bid to systematically lock up nearly all immigrants facing deportation proceedings has led to a fierce — and mounting — rejection by courts across the country.
That effort, which began with an abrupt policy change by Immigration and Customs Enforcement on July 8, has led to a tidal wave of emergency lawsuitsafter ICE’s targets were arrested at workplaces, courthouses or check-ins with immigration officers. Many have lived in the U.S. for years, and sometimes decades, without incident and have been pursuing asylum or other forms of legal status.
At least 225 judges have ruled in more than 700 cases that the administration’s new policy, which also deprives people of an opportunity to seek release from an immigration court, is a likely violation of law and the right to due process. Those judges were appointed by all modern presidents — including 23 by Trump himself — and hail from at least 35 states, according to a POLITICO analysis of thousands of recent cases. The number of judges opposing the administration’s position has more than doubled in less than a month.
In contrast, only eight judges nationwide, including six appointed by Trump, have sided with the administration’s new mass detention policy.
Courts, increasingly aware of the one-sided rejection of the administration’s policy, have grown exasperated by the deluge of litigation that has flooded their dockets. Some have made a partial accounting of the sheer volume of rulingsagainst the administration. But even those don’t capture the breadth of rulings against the administration revealed on dockets across the country.
“The Court is unable to remain current on all new case authority supporting the Court’s conclusion, given the continued onslaught of litigation being generated by [the administration’s] widespread illegal detention practices,” U.S. District Judge Christina Snyder, a California-based appointee of Bill Clinton, wrote in a Nov. 21 ruling
U.S. District Judge Hala Jarbou, a Michigan-based Trump appointee, described receiving more than 100 cases herself before another 97 detainees filed a joint lawsuit pleading for release. Judges have assailed the administration for defying the law and suggested the unprecedented interpretation of the law could subject millions of people to detention, even if they have lived in the country for decades without incident.
“Dozens of district courts across the nation — with more each day — have rejected DHS’s expansion of … mandatory detention,” U.S. District Judge Lynn Winmill, an Idaho-based Clinton appointee, wrote in a Nov. 19 ruling releasing 17 people detained during an Oct. 19 ICE raid at a racetrack. “This court joins the overwhelming majority.”
Nationwide relief could be on the way
Because the cases are typically brought by individual detainees on an emergency basis, there have been few broad attempts to block the ICE policy. But that may be changing. Judges in Massachusetts and Colorado recently certified class action lawsuits against ICE’s new approach. And on Tuesday, a judge in California approved a nationwide class, which could immediately force the administration to provide bond hearings to those subject to the ICE policy.
Appeals courts have just begun grappling with the policy and could issue rulings in weeks or months that help guide lower courts and stem the tsunami of litigation…
….
Judges are flooded with these cases
A POLITICO review of thousands of dockets across the country has shed light on the one-sided rebuke of ICE’s mass detention policy.
As of Tuesday, at least 225 federal judges have ordered release or bond hearings for more than 500 people facing deportation proceedings. Among those judges are 166 appointed by Democratic presidents, including 80 by Joe Biden, 66 by Barack Obama and 20 by Bill Clinton. Another 59 were appointed by Republican presidents, including 28 by George W. Bush, 23 by Trump, four by George H.W. Bush and four by Ronald Reagan.
And while many of the cases were concentrated in major cities, where Trump’s mass deportation campaign has been most aggressive, the emergency lawsuits have cropped up in nearly every state. Judges have ruled against the administration’s position in red states such as Missouri, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Nebraska, Texas and others….
…
Retired Judges on their President….
In a dozen interviews with The Washington Post, former judges and one soon-to-be-retired judge described a judiciary under incredible strain and its integrity threatened by partisan attacks, antagonistic rhetoric from public officials and ambiguous decisions handed down by the nation’s highest court….
Note….
I’m NO lawyer…..
But I see this as a criminally convicted President pursuing IILEGAL policy against the orders of Federal Judges….
And?
Everyone standing around with their hands in the pockets as people get snatched off the streets and put on planes to anywhere that the plane can land at….
‘America?….Give us your tired and Poor?’
image…Inside Higher Ed
One doesn’t have to be a lawyer to see how these Republicans are blatantly violating court orders and showing nothing but contempt for the “ law and order” they espouse support of .
The fact is they couldn’t care less about “ law and order” if it interferes with their political agenda.
And they have their right guy driving the bus
I HAVE to believe that like Humpy Dumpty?
The ‘Wall Will come crashing DOWN
BUT?
How long will it take?
How many people screwed ?
The Good thing is Democrats got to get their act TOGETHER and come out and FLEX
This dirt bag maybe just what Dem’s and Americs needed to wake up?