If the Trump 2.0, four year run, is anything like the convicted felon, ex-President has advertised he WANT’s it to be?
Lotta stuff IS going to be landing in the High Courts lap…..
The Senate HAS already begun to let Trump know it is NOT going to roll over for him….
What about the Supreme Court?
They gonna KEEP justifying their jobs, the Law and MOST of ALL….THE COUNTRY?
(Trump HAS actually had a rough time there except for the immunity win)
If pursued, Trump’s controversial agenda to deport undocumented immigrants en masse, end birthright citizenship, impose extensive tariffs, fire or relocate thousands of federal workers and abolish the Department of Education would surely unleash a flood of legal challenges.
Trump has lost at the Supreme Court more than any other modern president, according to one study, and several recent high court rulings that curbed the power of regulatory agencies could hem in his agenda. At the same time, Trump’s three nominees have moved the Supreme Court further to the right, establishing a supermajority that greatly expanded the definition of presidential immunity….
…
During Trump’s first term, he suffered a series of high-profile losses at the court.
The justices initially refused to allow Trump to fully enact his proposed travel ban that barred some foreigners from entering the United States, blocked the administration’s efforts to put a citizenship question on the 2020 Census and rescind an Obama-era plan to protect young undocumented immigrants known as “dreamers” from deportation. Trump also lost a pair of disputes in 2020 over subpoenas from Congress and the Manhattan district attorney for Trump’s financial records.
In all, the Trump administration was unsuccessful in nearly 60 percent of its cases before the high court, according to an analysis by University of Southern California law professors Rebecca L. Brown and Lee Epstein. The defeats have prompted Trump to lash out at the court at times….
….
But Trump will face a different court this time around, one that could be more amenable to his arguments….
….
“If the Supreme Court tells him some really important part of his immigration agenda is unconstitutional, and he perceives that as indispensable for what he is trying to accomplish, I wouldn’t want to bet which way that goes,” [ Clark Neily, the senior vice president for legal studies at the libertarian Cato Institute. ] Neily said. “It would be an extraordinary violation of history and norms.”….
Note…
Donald J. Trump has done some crazy assed stuff…..
He has NOT EVER disregarded the US Supreme Court ‘s authority….
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.