Biden has gone back to his days as Vice President in the Obama admin….
His plan IS a throwback….
It’s the same thing that he and Obama offered to get money back to local and state governments….
Biden does NOT explain where he’s getting the money from…
But the start-up money IS reasonable…..
Joe Biden wants to spend $1.3 trillion on infrastructure as president, aiming to reduce carbon emissions, create jobs and shore up the ailing Highway Trust Fund with “new revenues” in a plan released Thursday that’s reminiscent of the Obama years.
Biden’s 12-page plan promises to “ensure new revenues are secured to stabilize the Highway Trust Fund” but doesn’t specify where those revenues would come from or how he would get political consensus for them.
In many ways it’s also a throwback to the administration of President Barack Obama, with planks related to “complete streets,” repairing existing infrastructure before building new and calling for investments in transit and high-speed rail. The plan’s goal of working directly with cities, instead of always going through state departments of transportation as an intermediary, is another throwback.
Biden proposes spending $50 billion his first year in office, if elected, on repairing existing roads and bridges. Another $10 billion over 10 years would go to building transit in high-poverty areas. He’d put $1 billion a year into a grant program to help cities transition to automated vehicles. He’d double funding for BUILD and INFRA grants, increase funding for the Army Corps of Engineers and spend all harbor maintenance fees on their intended purpose….
image… Charlie Neibergall/AP Photo
Biden, Buttigieg, Bennet, Bullock, Harris, and Klobuchar all take a stand in support of America’s ally and the right of Israel to defend itself.
https://www.algemeiner.com/2019/11/14/front-runner-democratic-presidential-candidates-tout-support-for-iron-dome-back-israels-right-to-self-defense/
From Warren and Sanders…. silence.
I support an infrastructure plan provided it is implemented when the economy is relatively weak. The time to implement it is when there is a pool of available workers – and not when the government has to aggressively compete with the private sector to get its workforce.