If the Anti-Abortion types thought the Alito Supreme’s where gonna stop something that women feel is their ‘Right’ and decision?
They where sadly mistaken….
American woman STILL have the procedure and the courts decision just made things more elastic and available….
The NY Times is out with a piece that brings up the subject and the wish by some anti-abortion types to put women in JAIL for excercising influence over THEIR Bodies….
Four years after the U.S. Supreme Court eliminated the constitutional right to abortion, data shows the number of procedures has not fallen as many lawmakers and advocates expected. Instead, it has climbed, and abortions are still happening even in states with the strictest bans.
Recent estimates indicate that more than 1.12 million abortions were provided by U.S. clinicians in 2025, a level that has remained relatively stable in the past two years but represents a sharp rise—about 21 percent higher than in 2020, according to a Guttmacher report published in March of this year. 2020, the last full year of national data before the court’s ruling, reshaped access across the country.
That increase has come despite sweeping restrictions and outright bans enacted in many states following the historic decision….
…
What’s Driving the Rise in Abortions?
Experts point to several overlapping factors driving the unexpected rise.
One major contributor is the rapid expansion of telehealth and medication abortion, KFF data showed, which has transformed how patients access care. The ability to consult providers remotely and receive abortion pills by mail—including across state lines—has significantly lowered barriers for many people, particularly those living in states with strict bans. Online clinics and telemedicine providers now account for a growing share of abortions nationwide, reflecting a broader shift toward virtual care models….
…
What Happens Next
Four years on, the data suggest that the Dobbs ruling has fundamentally altered how abortion is accessed in the United States—but not necessarily how often it occurs. Instead of producing the expected decline, the decision has set off a complex reconfiguration of care, shaped by technology, interstate movement, and diverging state policies.
As the legal and political battles over abortion continue, the emerging evidence highlights a central paradox of the post-Dobbs era: restricting access in some places has not reduced demand nationwide—only changed where and how people obtain care….
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.