Supreme’s Rule Against Their Own Rule in Trump Deportation‘Rights’ Situations

I’m NO lawyer….

But didn’t the Supreme Court Rule that migrants had the right to a hearing bnefore being shippede out en-Mass?

Now the same court by a smaller majority says that a Federal Juidge in Boston is Wrong in stropping the Trump people from doing EXACTLY THAT?

I know the media says this ruling applies to anyone the Trump people want to export….

But in the Politico piece below it also says the Original ruling is basis for challenging exports…

In FACT?

Trump’s people HAVE BEEN quietly bringing BACK those shipped out that have gone to judges to contest their deportations without hearings….

Hmmmmmm?

The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for the Trump administration to swiftly deport foreigners to countries where they have no previous ties.

The justices lifted an order from a federal judge in Boston who had placed restrictions on the deportations to those countries. U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy had issued a nationwide injunction that required the administration to give immigrants “meaningful” advance notice and a chance to raise objections before they are sent to so-called third countries — nations not specified in their original deportation orders. But the Supreme Court granted the Trump administration’s emergency request to put Murphy’s injunction on hold.

The high court’s majority offered no explanation for its ruling, but all three of the court’s liberal justices dissented. Writing for the liberals, Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the ruling an “abuse” of the court’s power that amounted to “rewarding lawlessness” on the part of the administration. And lawyers for the immigrants who had relied on protection from the courts said the ruling would make them “vulnerable to torture or death” in dangerous countries.

The high court’s action grants officials added flexibility to carry out President Donald Trump’s mass deportation plans, particularly in cases involving countries that resist taking back their own citizens when they are ordered deported from the U.S. The justices’ ruling came in a case that produced explosive controversies over the Trump administration’s attempts to deport some immigrants with criminal records to Libya and South Sudan.

Despite the ruling, Murphy and other judges could continue to block third-country deportations in individual cases. The Supreme Court’s action could even trigger a flood of individual lawsuits on behalf of immigrants who fear the possibility they’ll be deported to a country not raised as a potential destination during their immigration hearings.

It could also prompt immigrants facing deportation to lodge more sweeping claims of “credible fear” from countries they have no connections to but are known as hotbeds of human rights abuses and mistreatment of foreigners. Under U.S. law and the United Nations Convention Against Torture, people cannot be deported to countries if they can show they are likely to face torture there.

The legal battle over third-country deportations had already produced several high-profile showdowns between the Trump administration and Murphy, who issued a temporary restraining order imposing the restrictions nationwide in March after several immigrants sued over abrupt changes to their deportation destinations. The Biden-appointed judge followed up a few weeks later with a longer-lasting preliminary injunction….

More…

Note…

In a VERY EVIDENT ongoing situation

Federal judges and Courts HAVE been almost UNIFORMLY AGAINST the Trump admin ‘s hacksaw detention action’s…

But the Alito 5 High Court judges have NOT….

It IS almost like the Alito crew believe that NO President,  except Trump,  CAN DO WTF they want ….

Donald,  on the other hand?

He CAN…..

And ole Donald IS a convicted criminal NO Less?

Judges ARE human….

It would appear some DO take sides against the Law in favor of ‘Their Guy’

This decesion seems to NOT much sense and 3 other judges of the court have pointed THAT out…