Washington Post: “The Harris team believes a second debate could give her another valuable platform to reach voters who are unlikely to attend her rallies or be swayed by her television ads.”
“The Harris campaign had been planning for weeks to press for a second debate but ultimately concluded it would be best to wait until the first debate was over before pushing for another.”
New York Times: Trump says he had a great debate. His allies privately say otherwise.
….
Rolling Stone: “By early Wednesday morning, multiple Trump aides were telling Rolling Stonethat their boss did not perform as well as they wished, that Harris had exceeded expectations, or simply that — in the words of one of the sources — getting Trump onstage for another debate against Harris is ‘not a priority’ for the campaign and its candidate right now.”
“A person close to Trump who was in Philadelphia on Tuesday simply told Rolling Stone Wednesday morning, ‘bad idea,’ when asked if Trump should debate Harris another time. This source wouldn’t elaborate, but it was clear that there’s an understanding within the upper ranks of Trumpland that the debate was not the knockout blow for ‘defining’ the vice president for which they had wished.”
“The former president himself has been adamant that only losers request rematches, and maintained — despite every indicator to the contrary — that he was Tuesday night’s victor.”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.