Just a thought….
No proff….
But If something told the ex-President that he would charged and arrested two weeks ago?
That might have been the situatioin then….
But with Trump attackin the DA and the media knocking, what ‘appeared’ to be DA Bragg’s case?
The DA’s people regrouped and are now seeking to do what the Feds have been doing…..
Making sure they dot their ‘i’s’ and crossa their ‘t’s….
We have had reports of the Manhattan DA bringing in Daniel’s, the woman who got the ‘hush money’ talking to Grand Jury….(She also brought conversation info for the DA)
David Pecker, Former National Enquirer publisher, also talking to the Grand Jury…
And a another lawyer that advised Michael Cohen….Robert Costello……
It would appear that Trump’s and House Republican efforts to derail the case has got the DA working HARDER …..
Since you believe the feds dotted their i’s and crossed their t’s….
Please explain why they decided not to bring a charge against Trump?
Easy…..
Prosecutors from the Southern District of New York developed significant evidence against Trump when they charged his former attorney Michael Cohen in 2018 over a hush money scheme paying two women claiming affairs with Trump, including adult film star Stormy Daniels, Honig writes. But prosecutors did not consider charging Trump at the time because of longstanding Justice Department guidance that a sitting president cannot be indicted.
With Trump about to leave office in January 2021, however, Audrey Strauss, the acting US attorney, held multiple discussions with a small group of prosecutors to discuss its evidence against Trump. They decided to not seek an indictment of Trump for several reasons, Honig writes, including the political ramifications and the fact that Trump’s other scandals, such as efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election and the January 6, 2021, insurrection, “made the campaign finance violations seem somehow trivial and outdated by comparison.”
“We were well aware of the prudential reasons why you wouldn’t charge a president, even after he was out of office,” one person with knowledge of the investigation told Honig…..
More…
It IS TWO years later….
With Bragg and Willis working on possible charges against Trump along with Jack Smith doing likewise?
The SDNY US Attorney deccesion hold NO water anymore…..
In fact?
If NY State AG Tish james wins a civil fraud case against Trump & Family?
Could the Feds come after them civilly or criminally for tax evasion?
Sure I’m pushing MORE cases besides Manhattan, Atlantia, Jan. 6 and Fla doucuments case’s, eh?…
But Jack Esq.?
Do YOU think ‘The Donald’ is gonna ‘ACE” all the above to win a second term as President?
REALLY?
I’ve never said Trump was going to win a second term .
Another LIE from the likes of you
The reasons the feds didn’t seek an indictment is as valid today as it was then.
Jack Smiths investigation has nothing to do with Braggs deal in New York.
As usual?
When cornered you start obfuscating and Lying.
As your Trump obsession continues…
Trump,Trump,Trump,TrumpTrumpTrump…….
Back to keyboards Monkey!
I stand by my point….
The lay of the land at the end of Trump’s term was VASTLY differnt than now where there are SEVERAL possible criminal indictments against a EX-PRESIDENT….
The SDNY has to get a Ok from the AG and I do NOT think Garland was predisposed to SERIOUS go after Trump then…Indeed the house files story cites the FBI worried about raiding Trump’s home….
The Justice Dept. INSISTED….
On the focus on Trump?
He’s the media story that drives media numbers….
Vertainly NOY Joe Biden who quietly goes about doing his job and provided the world with what Trump could never do….
Stability …