A look at a NY Times Op-Ed by Will Wilkinson
About why Donald Trump got so many votes but lost and Republicans did better in House and other down ballot races…
The media focus on President Trump almost ignoring the pandemic played on and ON….
It was a political beatdown…
Joe Biden is gonna disappoint a lot of people in putting America back together…
Because some of the Trump things will actually be kept by Biden and Kamala Harris…
But he is also going to have to keep the American economy going and not bite on the media push for any mass shutdown of the country …
Mask wearing and vaccine could help on that accord ….
Joe Biden DOES need to continue offering a steady hand at the helm of the country try…
To continue showing that he is about us ALL…
That he can and will play the political game for America….
Not just himself…
Ole’ Joe got that Right….
It earned him the prize on his third try….
President Trump’s disastrous mishandling of the coronavirus pandemic probably cost him re-election. Yet it seems mind-boggling that he still won more votes than any incumbent president in American history despite his dereliction of responsibility at a time of a once-in-a-century health crisis and economic devastation.
Why are President-elect Joe Biden’s margins so thin in the states that clinched his victory? And why did the president’s down-ticket enablers flourish in the turbulent, plague-torn conditions they helped bring about?
Democrats, struggling to make sense of it all, are locked in yet another round of mutual recrimination: They were either too progressive for swing voters — too socialist or aggressive with ambitious policies like the Green New Deal — or not progressive enough to inspire potential Democratic voters to show up or cross over.
But they should understand that there was really no way to avoid disappointment. Three factors — the logic of partisan polarisation, which inaccurate polling obscured; the strength of the juiced pre-Covid-19 economy; and the success of Mr. Trump’s denialist, open-everything-up nonresponse to the pandemic — mostly explain why Democrats didn’t fare better.
This shocking strategy worked for Republicans, even if it didn’t pan out for the president himself. Moreover, it laid a trap that Democrats walked into — something they should understand and adjust for, as best they can, as they look ahead….
…
He succeeded in putting Democrats on the defensive about economic restrictions and school closures. As months passed and with no new relief coming from Washington, financially straitened Democratic states and cities had little choice but to ease restrictions on businesses just to keep the lights on. That seemed to concede the economic wisdom of the more permissive approach in majority-Republican states and fed into Mr. Trump’s false narrative of victory over the virus and a triumphant return to normalcy.
But Democrats weren’t destined to get quite as tangled in Mr. Trump’s trap as they did. They had no way to avoid it, but they could have been hurt less by it. They allowed Republicans to define the contrast between the parties’ approaches to the pandemic in terms of freedom versus exhausting, indefinite shutdowns.
Democrats needed to present a competing, compelling strategy to counter Republican messaging. Struggling workers and businesses never clearly heard exactly what they’d get if Democrats ran the show, and Democrats never came together to scream bloody murder that Republicans were refusing to give it to them. Democrats needed to underscore the depth of Republican failure by forcefully communicating what other countries had done to successfully control the virus. And they needed to promise to do the same through something like an Operation Warp Speed for testing and P.P.E. to get America safely back in business….
image…Damon Winter/The New York Times
My Name Is Jack says
Once again a bs editorial comment with no evidence.
Where is this so called”media push for any mass shutdown of the country.”
I haven’t seen or read of that.
I have seen various people suggest such and the media report that.What?Are you saying they shouldn’t?You see James that is what the “media” does.They “report” what people say.Seemingly you don’t understand that when they “report “ something that is not the same as advocating that course of action.
Once again ,very Republican-like.Theyre always getting mad when the “media” reports what they do and say.Trump does the same thing.
Amusingly you’re entire site is a collection of “media” reports.
jamesb says
In fact the reporting leads to the group think conclusions….
Media reported on Hillary Clinton’s email’ San THAT became the fact to some….
Media reports of vast new virus infections have led to partial shutdown’s across the states …
THAT?
Is a good thing…
But there ar also media reports of new hoarding going on Jack…
That points to people becoming worried about ‘mass’ shutdown’s…
So much so that Fauci has had to respond to such worries….
jamesb says
Just keeping it real there Jack….
My Name Is Jack says
So apparently you are advocating that the “media” not report what you regard as “bad news” or news you don’t lije.
Very Trump like of you!
jamesb says
Nope….
Just pointing to their agenda’s
As we all deal with…
My Name Is Jack says
What “agenda?”
More obfuscation.
You have no knowledge of any “agenda.”
You’re just making stuff up.Lying.
jamesb says
Jack?
MSNBC learns left….
Fox, OAN, Newsmax lean Right…..
My Name Is Jack says
So?
What does any of this have to do with the statement that started this whole discussion.
Show us the “evidence” that any of these have an “agenda” of pushing for a shutdown of the country .
Just more silly obfuscation from the or point.