Hmmmm?
It has come the Chief Judge of the US Supreme Court pushing back against a President who is knocking another Federal Judge because he was appointed by President Obama…
Judges are fair minded….
But Donald Trump haas never stopped going after them in public if like other things?
They didn’t rule in HIS favor….
His way isn’t gonna make ANY judge, even those appointed by him, do things HIS way….
The Law comes first Trump is finding out….
And disrespecting judges in public, even ones on the Federal bench and Supreme Court?…. is not a way to get on rheir good sides…
Chief Justice John Roberts is pushing back against President Donald Trump for his description of a judge who ruled against Trump’s migrant asylum policy as an “Obama judge.”
It’s the first time the Republican-appointed leader of the federal judiciary has offered even a hint of criticism of Trump, who has previously blasted federal judges who ruled against him.
Roberts said Wednesday the U.S. doesn’t have “Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges.” He commented in a statement released by the Supreme Court after a query by The Associated Press.
Roberts said on the day before Thanksgiving that an “independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.”
Last year, the president used the term a “so-called judge” after the first federal ruling against his travel ban. During the presidential campaign, Trump criticized Roberts himself for the chief justice’s decisive vote in 2012 to preserve the Obama health care overhaul….
image…wsj.com
Trump of course wants the last word….Even with judges that might have to rule on his issues
President Trump hit back at Chief Justice John Roberts after the leader of the Supreme Court rebuked the president over his criticism of “Obama judges.”
Tweeted Trump: “Sorry Chief Justice John Roberts, but you do indeed have ‘Obama judges,’ and they have a much different point of view than the people who are charged with the safety of our country.”
He added: “It would be great if the 9th Circuit was indeed an ‘independent judiciary’ but if it is why are so many opposing view (on Border and Safety) cases filed there, and why are a vast number of those cases overturned.”
Politicalwire…