Did I really read this?….Holder says the five will not go free even if a jury and judge find them not guilty?

Is this for real?……

This is the whole post from Newsweek’s Michael Isikoff……

 

Full Post

Posted Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:28 PM

‘Heads I Win, Tails You Lose’: In 9/11 Case, KSM Won’t Walk Free Even If Found Not Guilty

Michael Isikoff

Attorney General Eric Holder acknowledged on Wednesday a previously unspoken proviso to the controversial decision to try alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four co-conspirators in a federal court in New York: even if the defendants are somehow acquitted, they will still stay behind bars.

Holder’s comments at a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee would seem to turn the criminal-justice system on its head. The whole point of a criminal trial is to determine guilt—and if the government fails to make its case beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant walks free.

At least that’s the way the system usually works.

Note: This whole thing is getting worst everyday….next they will be telling the judge and the jury what to say…..

THIS IS AMERICA….RIGHT?

 

Explore posts in the same categories: Media, Men, Politics, September 11

Tags: , , , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

3 Comments on “Did I really read this?….Holder says the five will not go free even if a jury and judge find them not guilty?”


  1. The USA you had aspirations of died on 09.12.01

    Freedoms are continuously eroding bit by bit.

    After a while of mandated health insurance the next phase will be government mandated medical practice

    This is not paranoia, but a throwback to the day of old when the USA mandated sterilization of certain individuals

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics

    Eugenics was supported by Woodrow Wilson, and, in 1907, helped to make Indiana the first of more than thirty states to adopt legislation aimed at compulsory sterilization of certain individuals.[57] Although the law was overturned by the Indiana Supreme Court in 1921,[58] the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a Virginia law allowing for the compulsory sterilization of patients of state mental institutions in 1927.[59]

    During the 20th century, researchers interested in familial mental disorders conducted a number of studies to document the heritability of such illnesses as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression. Their findings were used by the eugenics movement as proof for its cause. State laws were written in the late 1800s and early 1900s to prohibit marriage and force sterilization of the mentally ill in order to prevent the “passing on” of mental illness to the next generation. These laws were upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1927 and were not abolished until the mid-20th century. All in all, 60,000 Americans were sterilized.[60]

    PS Woodrow Wilson was a horrible president

  2. jamesb101 Says:

    TPL…what does this have to do with Holder…or the 9/11 trials?

  3. jamesb101 Says:

    you have to be a little bit crazy to run for presdient anyways……


Comment: